|
Michelle
Fine (National
Research Council, National Academies of Science)
"Do
you believe in Geneva?
Participatory
Action Research, Critical Methods and Indigenous Knowledges"
Drawing on
a series of critical participatory action research projects launched
in prison, schools and community with historically marginalized
youth and young adults, I am interested in interrogating the politics
and methods of interrupting what Gramsci called the 'passive revolution',
the drip fed ideologies of neo-liberalism that saturate. The question
birthed by Katrina -- who is looting and who is merely salvaging
some bread for their family -- will frame our conversation about
justice, research, politics and the realigned public sphere.(based on a paper by Michelle Fine, Eve Tuck and Sarah Zeller Berkman)
|
|
Plenary and Special Sessions
Friday
May 5 — Saturday May 6
1.
Doing and Troubling Policy Science
Michael Feuer at the National Academy of Sciences and Elizabeth
St.Pierre at the University of Georgia will continue the dialogue
across differences they began last year at this conference, this time
with a focus on Dr. Feuer's area of expertise, policy science. Feuer
explores the relation between cognitive science, rationality, and
education policy; and St.Pierre responds with a discussion of how
Feuer's work has challenged her to pay attention to educational policy
even as she deconstructs it.
Michael J. Feuer
Director of the Behavioral, Social Sciences, and Education Division
National Research Council
National Academies of Science
500 5th St.
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: (202) 363-2472
Email: mfeuer@nas.edu
Elizabeth Adams St.Pierre
Language & Literacy Education Department
125 Aderhold Hall
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602
Phone: (706) 542-5674
Email: stpierre@uga.edu
2.
Do We Need Standards for Qualitative Inquiry? A Roundtable Discussion
This session grows
out of discussion at last year’s Congress in terms of whether
qualitative research needs standards and, if so, of what sort
and by what process. Frederick Erickson and Harry Torrance will
present short discussion papers. Pam Moss will serve as discussant
for their remarks. Patti Lather will chair the session and help
open up the discussion to the audience. Our hope is that we “get
somewhere” in terms of understanding 1) the context in which
such issues are raised, 2) the possibilities and dangers of standards
for qualitative research, 3) what standards might make sense,
and 4) what process for delineating standards might make sense
and how might such standards be used (and abused). The panel’s
hope is to set the stage for a broad based discussion of such
matters that includes a high degree of audience participation.
Participants
| Patti
Lather
Ohio State University
121 Ramseyer
29 W. Woodruff
Columbus OH 43210
614-699-3044
Lather.1@osu.edu |
Harry
Torrance
Head of Research
Institute of Education
Manchester Metropolitan University
799 Wilmslow Road
Manchester M20 2RR, UK
tel: (+44) (0)161 247 2320
H.Torrance@mmu.ac.uk |
Frederick
Erickson
George F. Kneller Professor
of
Anthropology of Education
Graduate School of Education
& Information Studies
University of California, Los Angeles
Moore Hall, Box 951521
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1521
e-mail: ferickson@gseis.ucla.edu
|
Pamela
A. Moss
University of Michigan
4220 School of Education
610 East University
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259
734-647-2461
pamoss@umich.edu |
3.
Qualitative inquiry, Ethics and the Politics of Evidence:
Working within These Spaces Rather Than Being Worked Over by Them
Just as qualitative research is “endlessly creative and
interpretative” (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005), qualitative
researchers find themselves in the position of having to be endlessly
creative and interpretive with respect to the various spaces they
move in and out of as they conceptualize, conduct, write and report
their research. Two such spaces are new and mutated forms of “old”
regimes of truth based in audit culture, and refracted forms of
methodological fundamentalism and imperialism emanating from without,
but significantly also increasingly within, writing and talking
about qualitative research. Navigating and moving in and out of
these spaces creates tensions but also possibilities for qualitative
researchers. This presentation aims to encourage a focus on better
understanding these spaces, and how qualitative researchers do
and might, work within and on these spaces. As Baumann (2005)
points out “To work in the world, as distinct from being
‘worked out and about’ by it, one needs to know how
the world works”. This applies to the aspects of our worlds
that we call qualitative inquiry, ethics and the politics of evidence.
Participants
| Professor
Julianne Cheek
Director, Centre for Research into Sustainable Health Care,
School of Health Sciences
Director, Early Career Researcher Development, University
of South Australia
School of Health Sciences
City East Campus
University of South Australia
|
Steinar
Kvale
Department of Psychology
University of Aarhus
|
Pat Sikes(Chair)
School
of Education
University of Sheffield |
|
Janice
Morse
University
of Alberta
Int'l Institute for Qualitative Methodology
6-10, University Extension Centre
University of Alberta 8303 112 Street
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2T4
|
Lan Stronach
Education & Social Research Institute
Manchester, Metropolitan University
|
4.
Critical/Performative/Reflexive/Auto/Ethno/Graphy (or Writing Through the Boundaries): New Directions in Qualitative Inquiry
This plenary
session explores the promises and possibilities in approaches
to qualitative research that bleed and blend the boundaries of
categorical distinctions such as critical ethnography, performance
ethnography, autoethnography, reflexive ethnography and what might
be considered "traditional" ethnography to take the best of each;
enhancing each as a perspective on the other and productively
exposing the tender vulnerability and culpability of researchers
using sympathetic and empathic methods of humanistic research
in performance, communication and educational research.
Participants
Bryant
Alexander (Chair)
Department of Communication Studies
California State University
Los Angeles
|
Stacy
Holman Jones
Department
of Communication
University of South Florida
|
Cynthia
Dillard
Integrated Teaching and Learning
Ohio State University
|
Sandy
Grande
Education Department
Connecticut College
|
5. Narrative
Environments
The purpose
of the session is to provide an analytic framework for examining
the storying process in everyday life. Much of narrative analysis
in the social sciences has focused on the internal analysis in
the social sciences has focused on the internal “turns” in the
sociological study of narrativity. Personal stories especially
have been examined for the internal themes and structures representative
of particular life experiences or social worlds. This spotlight
session features a second, more recent turn, dealing with narrative
environments. The focus will be on how the circumstances of story
formation and storytelling shape the storying process, both in
terms of what is told and how that is conveyed. A variety of
sensitizing concepts will be discussed and illustrated, including
narrative practice, narrative ethnography, narrative embeddedness,
and narrative control. The session will highlight the reflexive
properties of interactional and institutional control.
Participants
Jay Gubrium
Department of Sociology
University of Missouri-Columbia
|
James Holstein
Department of Social & Cultural Sciences
Marquette University
|
6.
Emergent Knowledge in Acts of Writing: Writing Against the Grain
of Dominant Discourses
Participants
Bronwyn Davies
School of Education
James Cook University, Australia
|
Elzabeth
St. Pierre
Language & Literacy Education Department
University of Georgia
|
Suzanne
Gannon
Education
University of West Sydney, Australia
|
Eva Bendix Petersen
Education
Charles Sturt University, Australia
|
7.The
Regulation of Interpretive Research and Ethical Conduct in the
Academy: Dilemmas, Tensions and Contradictions
Participants
Katherine Ryan(Chair)
Department of Educational Psychology
College of Education
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
|
Thomas Schwandt
Department of Educational Psychology
College of Education
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
|
Gaile
Cannella
Early Childhood Education
College of Education
Arizona State University
|
Nick Burbules
Department of Educational Policy Studies
College of Education
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
|
Leon
Dash
Department of Journalism
College of Communications
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
|
|
Discussant:
Lizanne
Destefano
Department
of Educational Psychology College of Education
University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
8.Evolving
Ethical Systems, Human Subjects Protection, and Transnational
Research Contexts.
Participants
Radhika Viruru (Chair)
Texas A&M University
|
Marie Battiste
University of Saskatchewan
|
Beth Swadener
Arizona State University
|
Yvonna Lincoln
Texas A& M University
|
Cliff Christians
University of Illinois
|
Gaile S. Cannella
Arizona State University
|
|